IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 2/14/05 Washington Times Article, using glycemic index
DawnStorm
post Feb 16 2005, 03:47 PM
Post #1


Regular
***

Group: Members
Posts: 150
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Wheaton, MD
Member No.: 167



click on Metro section

Very interesting but not without its critics. (IMG:http://www.sugarbustersforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BA
post Feb 16 2005, 05:36 PM
Post #2


Administrator
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 266
Joined: 24-January 03
Member No.: 1



Couldn't find the article.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
davew
post Feb 17 2005, 12:00 AM
Post #3


Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 911
Joined: 26-January 03
From: Spokane, WA
Member No.: 90



Here it is:

http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20050214-094551-6180r.htm

Interesting. The drawback to low GI according to the article is the complexity. Too hard, too many numbers, long lists of food.

Doesn't seem that hard to me.

Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BA
post Feb 17 2005, 07:43 AM
Post #4


Administrator
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 266
Joined: 24-January 03
Member No.: 1



thanks, that got me to it
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th January 2018 - 01:27 AM